The New Higher School Certificate
Assessment Support Document
Board of Studies Requirements for Internal Assessment
Moving to a Standards-referenced Approach
Developing an Assessment Program for a Standards-referenced Approach
Using the Examination and Assessment
Supplement
Introduction
The New Higher School Certificate uses a standards-referenced approach
for assessing and reporting student achievement. This approach builds
on the sound practices
currently used in schools.
Schools already have policies and procedures in place to meet the Boards requirements for internal assessment.
This document is designed to help schools to plan their assessment practices. It:
-
outlines the Boards requirements for internal assessment of student achievement in Board Developed Courses
-
describes the stages in moving to a standards-referenced approach
-
explains the actions to take in preparing and conducting an internal assessment program
-
describes the key features of the Examination, Assessment and Reporting Supplement and its relevance to teaching and internal assessment
-
provides a glossary of key words.
This document should be read in conjunction with the Assessment, Certification and Examination (ACE) Manual, which provides detailed information on assessment and reporting requirements. Securing Their Future Newsletter 14 provides an overview of assessment and reporting in the New Higher School Certificate.
BOARD OF STUDIES REQUIREMENTS FOR INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
The requirements listed in this section apply to the Year 11 cohort in 2000 and the Year 12 cohort in 2001.
1 School Internal Assessment Program
Using the assessment requirements in the syllabus, schools must
develop an internal assessment program for each course that:
-
specifies the assessment tasks and the weighting for each task
-
provides a schedule of the tasks for the course.
Schools must also establish procedures that will apply to the assessment programs for all courses. These procedures are detailed in the syllabus and in the ACE Manual.
2 Assessment of Preliminary Courses
Principals will certify that students have satisfactorily completed
Preliminary courses. Satisfactory completion includes achievement
of some or all of the course outcomes.
In Preliminary courses, the components, weightings and tasks in the syllabus are advisory and may be varied to suit school needs.
3 Internal Assessment for the HSC Board Developed Courses
For each Board Developed Course, schools will be required to provide the Board with a mark for each student. The mark must be calculated in accordance with the Boards requirements for that course.
Schools will not be required to submit descriptions of student performance or to indicate a performance band.
The internal assessment mark is to be based on the HSC course only (except in Mathematics).
The internal assessment mark must incorporate the mandatory assessment components and weightings found in the syllabus document for each subject.
The mark submitted to the Board is to indicate the rank order of students and the relative differences between them in terms of their achievement.
Board Endorsed Courses
Schools are required to submit internal assessment marks for students undertaking any HSC Board Endorsed Course, in line with the Boards endorsement of those courses.
Vocational Education and Training Courses
Schools are not required to submit internal assessment marks for these courses.
Other Procedural Requirements
The following list will help schools to check that they are meeting Board requirements for HSC internal assessment.
The school has procedures to:
-
inform students in writing of the assessment requirements for each course before the commencement of the course
-
ensure that students are given adequate written notice of the nature and timing of assessment tasks
-
provide meaningful feedback to students on their performances in all assessment tasks
-
maintain records of marks awarded to each student for all assessment tasks
-
address issues relating to illness, misadventure and malpractice in assessment tasks
-
address issues relating to late submission and non-completion of assessment tasks
-
advise students in writing if they are not meeting the assessment requirements in a course and to indicate what is necessary to enable
students to satisfy the requirements -
inform students about their entitlements to school reviews and appeals to the Board
-
conduct school reviews of assessments when requested by students in accordance with Board procedures as outlined in the ACE Manual
-
ensure that students are aware of the procedures the school has established for issuing the student assessment advice notices produced by the Board.
If these procedures are in place and working well there is no need for adjustments. If adjustments to assessment procedures are needed, the following Board documents will be useful:
HSC Assessment: A Guide to Developing Procedures in Schools (1996)
Preliminary and HSC Assessment under Pathways (1995)
Further advice is available from the Board of Studies Liaison Officer for your school.
MOVING TO A STANDARDS-REFERENCED APPROACH
To help explain the move to a standards-referenced approach from the norm-referenced approach used for the current Higher School Certificate, the features are compared below.
|
In the current norm-referenced approach |
In the new standards-referenced approach |
|
Students are assessed and reported by relating their performance to the performance of others who have taken the same course in the same year. |
Student achievement is assessed and reported with reference to specified standards of performance. |
|
Marks awarded to students reflect where their achievements place them relative to other students in the group. |
Marks awarded to students reflect the standards they have achieved. |
|
Comparisons can be made between students by looking at their positions in the group. |
Comparisons can be made between students based on their achievement of the standards. |
|
Final examination marks are based on a predetermined proportion of students in each mark range. This means standards can change over time but the proportions of students achieving each mark range will remain the same. |
Final examination marks are determined by the proportions of students who achieve each performance standard. There is no predetermined pattern of marks. This means over time, while standards remain constant, the proportions of students achieving each standard may change from year to year. |
|
There is a limit on the number of students who can receive top marks. |
There are no limits on the number of students who can reach the top standard. |
|
Students can receive marks below 50 even though they have achieved the course outcomes. |
All students who meet the minimum standard receive a mark of 50. Students who perform above the minimum standard expected receive higher marks |
|
Reporting is based on marks and percentile bands. |
Reporting includes information on the knowledge, skills and understanding typically demonstrated by students who achieve a performance standard. |
Under a standards-referenced approach it is still possible to make interpretations of individual performance relative to position in a group. For example, the higher a students mark the better their achievement. This means that a standards-referenced system can still support a selection process, as well as providing much richer information about student achievement by describing what students know and can do.
Changes to internal assessment from 2001
In a standards-referenced approach, the assessment mark submitted to the Board will still need to reflect the rank order and relative differences between the achievement of students, as is the case in the current Higher School Certificate. The difference in a standards-referenced approach for the New Higher School Certificate is that:
-
rank order and relative differences will come from student achievement of specified standards of performance instead of simple comparisons between students
-
the standards that the differences are based on are explicit and are incorporated in the syllabus, examination tasks, performance descriptions, and other materials to be provided.
It has always been acknowledged that the introduction of standards into school-based assessment will need to occur gradually over several years. It is to be expected in the early stages that judgements about standards will differ. This will not disadvantage any students. Moderation of school assessment marks using the performance of the school course group in the examinations will still be in place. This will ensure that internal assessment marks and examination marks are aligned to the same standard.
It is expected that all schools will be able to use a standards-referenced approach to assessment for the Higher School Certificate in 2003. By then teachers will be familiar with the standards, the performance descriptions will have undergone refinement following the 2001 HSC examinations, and samples of student work exemplifying performance standards for each course will be available.
In the 2003 HSC, standards-referenced assessment will involve:
-
assessing against standards
-
assessment tasks designed to focus on outcomes
-
the type of assessment task being appropriate for the outcomes being assessed
-
students being given the opportunity to demonstrate their level of achievement of the outcomes in a range of different task types
-
students knowing the assessment criteria before they begin a task
-
marking schemes for each task linked to the standards by including the wording of syllabus outcomes and relevant performance descriptions
-
students getting meaningful feedback about what they are able to do and what they need to do in order to improve their level of performance
-
the ranking and relative difference between students resulting from different levels of achievement of the specified standards.
The following pages are a guide to assessment practice over the first years of the New Higher School Certificate.
For the 2001 Higher School Certificate
What is required
-
Schools are to provide a mark only, calculated in accordance with Board requirements.
-
The mark will reflect the rank order and relative differences in student achievement as is currently the case.
-
Clear feedback is to be given to students on their achievement of outcomes and relative positions within the school.
Suggested features of school assessment programs
-
Assessment tasks are focused on outcomes.
-
A range of task types is used.
-
Students know and understand the outcomes to be assessed.
-
Marking schemes for tasks use words from the outcomes and, where considered appropriate, words from the draft performance descriptions.
-
Feedback to students is based on the marking schemes and indicates achievement of outcomes.
Note: teachers need to be familiar with the standards in the syllabuses.
What documents are available
-
Syllabuses with outcomes linked to objectives and specific descriptions of content.
-
Syllabuses outlining the types of tasks appropriate for assessment.
-
Draft of performance descriptions in bands.
-
Specimen examination papers and marking guidelines.
For the 2002 Higher School Certificate
What is required
-
Schools are to provide a mark only, calculated in accordance with Board requirements.
-
The mark will reflect the rank order and relative differences in student achievement as is currently the case.
-
Clear feedback to students on their achievement of outcomes and relative positions within the school.
Suggested features of school assessment programs
-
Assessment tasks are focused on outcomes.
-
The type of assessment task clearly reflects the outcomes being assessed.
-
Students know and understand the outcomes to be assessed and the levels of performance reflected in the marking schemes.
-
Marking schemes for tasks are linked to the standards by including the wording of outcomes and relevant performance descriptions.
-
Feedback to students is provided using the outcomes and relevant performance descriptions.
- Ranking and relative differences come from different levels
of achievement of the specified standards.
Note: teacher understanding of the standards will be further clarified by performance descriptions, samples of student responses and examination reports.
What documents are available
-
Performance descriptions incorporating levels of achievement in the 2001 HSC and performance on outcomes that are not readily assessed externally.
-
Examination reports on 2001 HSC.
-
Work samples illustrating standards of student performance in the 2001 HSC.
An Outline for Assessment Planning
What will need to be done for assessment of Year 11 in 2000
For the first Year 11 cohort of the New Higher School Certificate, it will not be necessary to make immediate changes. The Boards requirements have remained the same.
Components and weightings for some Preliminary courses may have changed. While teachers may wish to change their assessment programs, Preliminary course components and weightings are advisory, not mandatory.
What will need to be done for the Year 12 cohort in 2001
The Boards procedural requirements for internal assessment
have not changed. If the schools current policies meet the
Boards requirements, they will be appropriate for the 2001
Higher School Certificate. Preparation of the internal assessment
programs for Year 12, 2001 will need to take place for each HSC
course. A suggested timeframe for this is June 2000. This will provide
time for schools to publish their assessment programs prior to the
first HSC
tasks being set.
Early in 2002 schools will receive sample materials including:
-
samples of students examination responses at the cut-off points between performance bands
-
samples of student work showing levels of achievement on internal assessment tasks where appropriate.
These sample materials will help teachers understand the different levels of achievement of syllabus standards.
By the 2003 HSC, teachers will be able to:
-
take account of the performance scales and use their understanding of the different levels of achievement from the band descriptions and work samples in determining their assessment marks.
DEVELOPING AN ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FOR A STANDARDS-REFERENCED APPROACH
In the New Higher School Certificate:
-
the syllabus demonstrates standards by specifying knowledge, skills and understanding expected to be learned by students as a result of studying a course
-
the performance band descriptions (and other materials to be provided) demonstrate standards by specifying the levels of achievement of the knowledge, skills and understanding.
The diagram below shows how each of the elements of the internal assessment program plays a part in the assessment of student achievement in relation to standards.
The Board requires internal assessment programs to be developed using the mandatory components and weightings in the syllabus.
It is also important to remember:
-
the assessment mark is to be based on the HSC course only (exept in Mathematics)
-
there should be a balance between the assessment of knowledge and understanding outcomes and course content, and skills outcomes and content
-
35 tasks are probably sufficient
-
a range of assessment tasks should be used as outlined in the syllabus
-
individual tasks should be usually worth between 10% and 40% of the total assessment mark.
Where appropriate the types of tasks used for internal assessment should be broader than those used in the HSC examinations for the course. This gives students the opportunity to demonstrate their achievement of the standards in different ways. A broader range of tasks also allows a wider range of outcomes to be assessed than may be possible in the external examination.
The following format may be a useful guide when developing an assessment program.

Note that:
-
The same outcomes may be assessed by more than one task.
-
One task can assess more than one component.
- Later tasks carry more weight.
Such a format assists teachers to judge whether the assessment program:
-
meets the mandatory requirements for components and weightings
-
assesses the outcomes of the course
-
has an appropriate number and range of tasks consistent with the guidance provided in the syllabus
-
has an appropriate timing for the tasks
-
has appropriate relative weightings for tasks.
To arrive at a students final assessment marks the students marks in each assessment task are combined. The marks for the tasks can be combined by using valid statistical procedures that ensure the intended weightings are applied. Software packages, such as the Boards Motorised Markbook, can make this a very simple task.
DESIGNING ASSESSMENT TASKS
Teachers can begin to use a standards-referenced approach to assessment by incorporating some key features into the design of their tasks. The following steps illustrate this, and an example from Geography is given on pages 1617.
Designing an Assessment Task
Step 1 From the assessment program note:
-
the outcomes and components to be assessed
-
the task type chosen that will enable the outcomes to be assessed effectively.
Key Feature: The focus on outcomes.
Step 2 Prepare the task, including any stimulus material that will be needed.
- The task should allow each student to demonstrate his or her
level of achievement.
Key Feature: Students have the opportunity to demonstrate what they know and can do.
Step 3 Check the task for:
validity Will the task measure what you want it to?
reliability Will the task give consistent results?
Check that:
-
the instructions are clear
-
the language level is appropriate
-
the task is the right length
-
the level of difficulty is appropriate
-
the task is free from bias.
Key Feature: Ensuring that the task is assessing what you want to assess and giving accurate information on each students achievement.
Step 4 Develop a marking scheme.
-
The wording of outcomes and the performance scale can help with developing marking criteria and deciding what marks will be allocated to different levels of performance.
-
Check that students will be appropriately rewarded for the levels of knowledge, skills and understanding they demonstrate.
-
Share your expectations with students so that they understand what needs to be done to gain good marks.
Key Feature: Clear expectations based on standards.
Step 5 Trial the marking scheme.
- When students have completed the task, mark the work of a sample
of students. If necessary, adjust the scheme to cater for responses
not covered by the marking
scheme but which demonstrate achievement of the outcomes.Key Feature: Marking scheme accomodates how students demonstrate achievement of outcomes.
Step 6 Mark the responses of the whole group.
- When more than one class does the same task, consider double
or panel marking to improve consistency.
Key Feature: All students are marked consistently.
Step 7 Provide feedback to students on the strengths and weaknesses of their performances as well as their marks.
-
The wording of outcomes and the band descriptions can be used where appropriate.
-
The feedback should be designed to assist students to improve their performance.
Key Feature: Feedback is linked to student achievement of outcomes.
Step 8 Record individual student marks for the task.
-
Brief notes on the strengths and weaknesses of each students performance may be helpful.
Key Feature: Record of marks is maintained.
Keeping records
The Board requires schools to maintain records of marks awarded
to each student for all assessment tasks. The Board will not require
schools to keep student responses to tasks to illustrate standards
of performance.


USING THE EXAMINATION AND ASSESSMENT SUPPLEMENT
The Sample Paper
In the New Higher School Certificate, external examinations will assess students achievement against standards of performance by:
-
setting questions that are based on sampling from the course outcomes
-
using marking schemes that provide a link between the course outcomes and the band descriptions in the performance scale.
There are a number of things that students should know about examination questions.
-
HSC exams will use a variety of question types to measure students levels of achievement. It is important that students know about the demands of different types of questions and how to respond to them.
-
It is important that students are familiar with the way that questions will be structured to indicate what is expected in the response.
Sample examination papers illustrate the types of questions in the HSC examination and how they will be set out.
The Marking Guidelines
The marking guidelines for sample papers show what students are expected to know or do in order to receive particular marks for each question.
The Performance Descriptions
The performance scales containing performance descriptions in bands are primarily a tool for reporting at the end of the HSC course. They are based on the HSC course outcomes. However, they can have a useful place in supporting teaching and learning throughout Years 11 and 12. They can be used to provide :
-
goals for the development of student learning in the course
-
a common language for providing feedback
-
a means for helping students chart their progress.
They become more relevant the further into the HSC course students have progressed.
Once the performance scales move from draft form after the 2001 HSC examination teachers might use the scales as a broad guide to the range of marks for their internal assessment. Schools will not be required to submit descriptions of student performance or to indicate a performance band.
